[Pseudo-]Artistic 'Conceits' .... etc ...
Lacking 'real' "muses"/"muzes" ... I made them up ... using, eg, radio voices or ex-girlfriends as if 'models' ...
{What was the word for 'experiencing with one sense ... another sense' [smelled visions, tasted sounds, touched smells, etc]? 'sinner-see-ee-or[ism]'? 'xcus/ze my spellin' [see/sea synaesthesia/syn_esthesia (or was it all 'sinnergysm'/'synergism - or even oddly 'syngamy'/'sin-gamey' .. or ... '.?.' ...)] ? ...}
Anyway ...
Now down they came to the water's edge, streaming tears ... drops of sea-stuff returning to the world-wide waterway.
[What was that 'contested' phrase - among literary critics - from Dylan Thomas? ... 'a grief ago' ... (as if a 'time unit' ...) ... ?]
Anyway
Rumour has it that if you throw a cup of water into the sea and return a decade or so later to scoop up a fresh cup of water from the same (which is not of course the same) bit of the sea, then, despite all the churning and mixing that has occurred in the sea over the decade or so, the cup will contain some molecules of the water you threw into the sea at the earlier time. It seems unlikely, but statistical probabilities suggest it - there are more molecules of water in a cup (whatever its size) than there are cups (or the equivalent volume) in the sea.
'I don't know what to say.'
'No words. No words. Hush.' [K.Lear]
Hush[sh...sh...]
Sea sounds. See changes.
...
connections/con-X-ions
http://philiptalbot.blogspot.co.uk/
No comments:
Post a Comment